E-Bike Motor Power Claim Comparator
A "750W" e-bike and a "1000W peak" e-bike can be the identical motor. Federal law regulates one number; marketing headlines usually lead with the other, bigger one. We fetched four independently owned brands' own current product pages directly to see how each one actually discloses both figures — or doesn't.
The statute doesn't say which number it means — and most brands' own figure doesn't clear it either way.
15 U.S.C. §2085(b), the federal definition of a
"low-speed electric bicycle," requires a motor of "less than 750 watts." Five of the six named
models below that publish a nominal figure state it as exactly "750W" — read literally, that's
not under 750, it's at 750. Only Aventon's own Soltera.2, at 350W nominal, clears
the wording without any ambiguity.
One brand's own product URL and its own specs table don't agree with each other.
Engwe's EP-2 Pro page is hosted at a URL containing "750w" — but the specs table on that exact
page states only "960W peak brushless gear motor," with no nominal figure anywhere on the
page to check. Their L20 page does the reverse split: 750W sits in the specs table, and 960W
appears only in the page's marketing headline above it.
Every stated figure, unfiltered
This table doesn't depend on what you typed above — every figure here is straight from each brand's own current page.
| Brand | Model | Their own nominal | Their own peak | Gap | Clears "less than 750W"? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aventon | Aventure 3 | 750 W | 1440 W | 1.92x | No — exactly at the line, not under it |
| Aventon | Soltera.2 2.5 | 350 W | 540 W | 1.54x | Yes — 350 W is under 750 |
| Lectric | XPress 750 | 750 W | 1310 W | 1.75x | No — exactly at the line, not under it |
| Rad Power Bikes | RadWagon | 750 W | not published | — | No — exactly at the line, not under it |
| Rad Power Bikes | RadRunner | 750 W | not published | — | No — exactly at the line, not under it |
| Engwe | L20 | 750 W | 960 W | 1.28x | No — exactly at the line, not under it |
| Engwe | EP-2 Pro | not published | 960 W | — | No nominal figure published to check |
What this does not do
- It compares seven named models across four independently owned brands, not every e-bike on the market — only models whose own current page states a wattage figure this fetcher could read as plain text.
- 15 U.S.C. §2085(b) is the federal definition; it doesn't by itself settle what's legal to ride where. States layer their own Class 1/2/3 e-bike rules on top of it, most (not all) using the same 750W nominal figure. This tool checks only the federal statute's own wording, not state or local law, and is not legal advice.
- A brand's own "nominal" or "rated" figure is a nameplate convention, not a number measured to sub-watt precision. Reading a stated "750W" as failing to clear "less than 750 watts" is a literal textual point about the label, not a claim that a specific bike has been found non-compliant.
- The peak-to-nominal range below (1.28x–1.92x) comes from only four named models that happen to publish both numbers. A fifth brand's motor could easily fall outside it — the peak-only estimate says so explicitly rather than pretending to certainty.
- Rad Power's own two pages checked state no peak figure at all; Engwe's own EP-2 Pro page states no nominal figure at all. Both are reported as "not published," never filled in with a guess.