Research Tool Bench

Gas Grill Heat Density Comparator

Last updated 2026-08-23

Gas grills are marketed on total main-burner BTU. That number climbs with the size of the grill's own grate, so it doesn't say how intensely a square inch of that grate actually gets heated. We fetched six brands' own current product pages directly and divided each one's own stated main burner BTU by its own stated primary cooking area — a figure both numbers were already sitting next to on the same spec page, just never divided.

More total BTU, less heat per square inch — twice, on brands' own numbers Weber's own Genesis E-435 page states 48,000 BTU across 646 sq in of primary cooking area — more total BTU than Broil King's own Baron 420 Pro Shadow page states (40,000 BTU across 460 sq in) — yet the Genesis works out to 74.3 BTU per square inch against the Baron's 87.0. The same reversal appears at the small end: Char-Broil's own Amplifire 4-Burner page states more total BTU (25,000) than Weber's own Spirit E-310 page (24,000), but a lower density (59.5 vs. 66.7). Total BTU alone gets the ranking backwards both times.
Your grill's own spec sheet

Where the number comes from

Heat density here is just main burner BTU ÷ primary cooking area in square inches — no unit conversion, because both figures are already stated in the same units on each brand's own page. It is a plain average across the whole grate, not a measurement of any one burner or any one spot on it.

What this does not do

Every figure, unfiltered

BrandModelMain burner BTUPrimary cooking areaBTU / sq in
Char-Broil Performance Series Amplifire 4-Burner (463341021) 25,000 BTU 420 sq in 59.5
Weber Spirit E-310 (LP) 24,000 BTU 360 sq in 66.7
Weber Genesis E-435 (LP) 48,000 BTU 646 sq in 74.3
Weber Genesis E-330 (LP) 39,000 BTU 513 sq in 76.0
Broil King Baron 420 Pro Shadow 40,000 BTU 460 sq in 87.0
Broil King Regal S 490 Pro Infrared 50,000 BTU 500 sq in 100.0

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere. BTU shows up as the headline marketing number in another product category too, with the same gap between what's advertised and what's actually standardized — see the portable AC BTU coverage comparator.